Software Development
Legacy Application Modernization Services
Your old system still runs the business. We replace it piece by piece, so operations carry on while the new version gradually takes over.
- 01Legacy system assessment
- 02VB6 and desktop app migration
- 03.NET Framework to modern .NET
- 04Monolith decomposition
- 05Database modernization
- 06Cloud migration
- 07Data migration and cutover planning
At a glance
Legacy application modernization is replacing or upgrading old software, such as VB6 apps, .NET Framework sites and fragile monoliths, while the business keeps running on it. It's for companies stuck with systems that are hard to maintain or patch. Tag4 Technology Solutions maps the hidden business rules first, then moves features to new code one module at a time using the strangler pattern.
Updated
- Best for
- VB6, Web Forms, Access and .NET Framework apps nobody wants to touch
- Typical timeline
- 6–18 months to fully modernize a mid-sized system, delivered in stages
- Typical budget
- $10k–$30k for an assessment; $40k–$120k for a .NET Framework upgrade
- Approach
- Strangler pattern, with no single big-bang cutover weekend
- Core technologies
- Modern .NET, ASP.NET Core, YARP, Blazor, React, Azure SQL
- Offices
- New York, Chicago, Dallas, Toronto, Sydney, Dubai
Somewhere in your company there's an application nobody wants to touch. Maybe it's a VB6 desktop app, a Web Forms site on .NET Framework 4.x, an Access database that grew up, or a monolith where every change risks breaking something unrelated. It mostly works. But the original developers are gone, it only runs on a server you can't patch, and finding anyone to maintain it gets harder every year. Our legacy application modernization services are built for exactly this situation.
The riskiest approach is the one most people reach for first: freeze the old system, rewrite everything, and switch over in one weekend. Those projects overrun because the old code holds years of undocumented business rules, and cutover weekend is when everyone discovers them. We use the strangler pattern instead. A routing layer sits in front of the old system, and features move to new code one module at a time. Users shift over gradually, both versions share data during the transition, and any piece that misbehaves can be rolled back.
Before rewriting anything, we map what the current system really does. That means reading the code, tracing stored procedures and database triggers, and sitting with the people who use it daily. A discount that only applies on the last business day of the quarter is exactly the kind of hidden rule that sinks rewrites, so we record each one and turn it into an automated test against the old system first.
Not every legacy app needs a rewrite. Sometimes moving from .NET Framework to modern .NET, containerizing it and adding an API buys you years. When a full modernization is the right call, mid-sized systems typically take 6–18 months, delivered in stages that each put something useful into production. You'll get an assessment with options at different price points before committing to any of them.
What we do
Legacy Application Modernization services
Legacy system assessment
A written review of code, data, dependencies and business rules, with options from rehosting to full replacement and rough costs for each.
VB6 and desktop app migration
Moving VB6, WinForms, Delphi or Access applications to browser-based apps that need no installs or Citrix sessions.
.NET Framework to modern .NET
Upgrading ASP.NET Web Forms, MVC and WCF services to current .NET, often the quickest route off unsupported Windows servers.
Monolith decomposition
Splitting a monolith into clearly bounded modules or services where it helps, without creating more microservices than your team can run.
Database modernization
Untangling stored procedures, cleaning up schemas and migrating from older SQL Server, Oracle or Access databases to supported platforms.
Cloud migration
Moving legacy workloads from on-premises servers to Azure or AWS, with the changes needed to run well there rather than a straight lift-and-shift.
Data migration and cutover planning
Scripted, repeatable data migrations with reconciliation reports, rehearsed in staging before every switchover.
How we work
What you can expect from us
Strangler pattern by default
New code grows around the old system one module at a time. There is no single cutover weekend where everything has to go right.
Capture the rules before rewriting them
Characterization tests run against the legacy system, so the new version provably matches its behavior, including the quirks your users depend on.
Something useful in every stage
Each release gives users something they notice, like a faster screen or a report that used to take a day. Budgets are easier to defend when progress is visible.
Honest about when not to rewrite
If an upgrade and a new API layer give the old app five more good years, we will recommend that over a full rebuild.
Tools and platforms
- Modern .NET (8 and later)
- ASP.NET Core
- C#
- YARP reverse proxy
- Blazor
- React
- Entity Framework Core
- SQL Server
- Azure SQL
- Azure App Service
- Docker
- Azure Kubernetes Service
Process
From first call to production
Discovery
A few working sessions to pin down goals, users, constraints and what "done" means. You get a written scope and estimate.
Design
Architecture, data model and clickable UI before heavy coding starts, so surprises show up early and cheaply.
Build
Two-week sprints with a demo at the end of each one. You see working software, not status reports.
Launch
Automated tests, staged rollout, monitoring and a rollback plan. Go-live should be boring.
Support
Bug fixes, updates and new features on a monthly plan, or a clean handover to your team.
FAQ
Legacy Application Modernization: common questions
How much does legacy application modernization cost?
An assessment usually costs $10k–$30k and gives you costed options. Upgrading a .NET Framework app to modern .NET is often a $40k–$120k project, while full rewrites of large line-of-business systems commonly run to several hundred thousand dollars, spread across stages. How much undocumented logic the system holds matters more than its line count.
Should we rewrite or refactor?
Refactor or upgrade when the core design still fits the business and the main issue is an outdated platform. Rewrite when the architecture blocks changes you need, or when the technology is unsupportable, as with VB6. Most projects end up doing some of each.
What is the strangler pattern?
It's a way of replacing a system gradually. A proxy sends each request to either the old or the new application, and features move to the new side one at a time until the old system handles nothing and can be switched off. It removes the risk of one big cutover.
Will our users face downtime during the migration?
Usually only short, planned windows for data moves, often overnight or on a weekend. Because modules move one at a time, most releases need no downtime at all. We rehearse every cutover in staging first.
Our original developers are gone. Can you still work with the code?
Yes, that's the normal situation with legacy systems. We reverse-engineer behavior from the code, the database and user interviews, then document what we find so you're never dependent on a single person again.
Can we keep using the old system during the project?
Yes, and you should. The legacy app stays live while new modules take over, with both sharing data through the transition. You decide when each part is retired.
Related
Often paired with
Cloud Solutions
Migrations to AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, planned workload by workload with cost built into the design.
Learn moreCustom Software Development
Software built around your processes, from small internal tools to full platforms, with code you own outright.
Learn moreDevOps Services
CI/CD, Terraform, Kubernetes and observability, set up so your team can run it without us.
Learn moreIndustries we build for
Planning a legacy application modernization project?
Tell us what you are trying to build. An engineer reads every message and replies personally. No sales sequences, no pressure.